Responsive image
  • dashboardHome
  • appsDashboard
  • location_cityAbout the Project
  • location_cityDepartment Details
  • peopleCandidate Details
  • placeTraining Venue
  • dashboardBatch Details
  • dashboardForensic Tools
  • imageImage Gallery
  • video_libraryVideo Gallery
  • dashboardFeedback Report
  • lockFeedback Login
  • lockCoordinator Login
  • lockOperator Login
Development of Cyber Forensic Training cum Investigation Labs in North-Eastern States and Cloud based centralized Cyber Forensics Lab Infrastructures
Development of Cyber Forensic Training cum Investigation Labs in North-Eastern States and Cloud based centralized Cyber Forensics Lab Infrastructures

Feedback Report

Consolidated Feedback Report State Wise Feedback Report
Consolidated Feedback Report

State Wise Feedback Report

Feedback Consolidated Report (Arunachal Pradesh)

Total Trained Candidate: 370 Total Feedback Count : 0
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 0 0 0 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 0 0 0 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 0 0 0 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 0 0 0 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 0 0 0 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 0 0 0 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 0 0 0 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 0 0 0 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 0 0 0 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 0 0 0 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Assam)

Total Trained Candidate: 1286 Total Feedback Count : 0
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 0 0 0 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 0 0 0 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 0 0 0 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 0 0 0 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 0 0 0 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 0 0 0 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 0 0 0 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 0 0 0 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 0 0 0 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 0 0 0 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Manipur)

Total Trained Candidate: 738 Total Feedback Count : 662
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 531 129 2 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 534 119 9 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 521 136 5 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 529 131 2 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 540 117 5 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 539 118 5 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 541 118 3 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 543 116 3 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 556 105 1 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 555 103 4 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 581 76 5 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Meghalaya)

Total Trained Candidate: 695 Total Feedback Count : 0
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 0 0 0 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 0 0 0 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 0 0 0 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 0 0 0 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 0 0 0 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 0 0 0 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 0 0 0 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 0 0 0 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 0 0 0 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 0 0 0 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Mizoram)

Total Trained Candidate: 585 Total Feedback Count : 486
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 453 33 0 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 456 30 0 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 464 22 0 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 465 21 0 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 480 6 0 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 471 15 0 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 486 0 0 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 483 3 0 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 480 6 0 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 479 7 0 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 484 2 0 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Nagaland)

Total Trained Candidate: 551 Total Feedback Count : 544
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 312 216 16 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 293 213 34 4 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 193 318 32 1 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 166 346 29 3 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 186 324 33 1 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 223 301 19 1 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 296 240 8 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 255 272 16 1 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 255 278 10 1 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 270 252 16 6 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 330 208 6 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Sikkim)

Total Trained Candidate: 510 Total Feedback Count : 0
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 0 0 0 0 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 0 0 0 0 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 0 0 0 0 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 0 0 0 0 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 0 0 0 0 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 0 0 0 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 0 0 0 0 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 0 0 0 0 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 0 0 0 0 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 0 0 0 0 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 0 0 0 0 0


Feedback Consolidated Report (Tripura)

Total Trained Candidate: 419 Total Feedback Count : 329
S. No Please indicate your impressions of the items listed below. Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
1. The training met my expectations 205 112 11 1 0
2. I will be able to apply the knowledge learned 171 136 21 1 0
3. The training objectives for each topic were identified and followed 163 141 24 1 0
4. The content was organized and easy to follow 152 146 30 1 0
5. The materials distributed were pertinent and useful 168 129 30 2 0
6. The trainer was knowledgeable 169 122 38 0 0
7. The quality of instruction was good 167 128 32 2 0
8. The trainer met the training objectives 163 132 34 1 0
9. Class participation and interaction were encouraged 149 149 30 1 0
10. Adequate time was provided for questions and discussion 178 127 22 2 0
Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor
11 How do you rate the training overall? 171 132 26 0 0